Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Wallace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SK 1. However, this is an unsourced BLP so I'm going to move it to the incubator. Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Sam Wallace. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Wallace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completed an unfinished AfD. No vote at this point from me.-gadfium 09:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -gadfium 09:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What was the original nominator's rationale? - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 18:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The anon didn't give a rationale, and since the same IP has since made obvious vandalism to the article I think we can speedy close this as being made not in good faith.-gadfium 20:30, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep because, as User:gadfium said above, the fact that the anonymous nominator didn't give a rationale for deletion. - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 20:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep per Jorgath. Cavarrone (talk) 05:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.