Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Higo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 13:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Higo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't see that much notability-maybe someday as this guy is VERY young. but for now no. (Had a prod tag but this seemed better or a speedy even) Wgolf (talk) 17:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless the author or someone adds reliable sources, as right now it violates WP:BLP. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above - Violates BLP as unsourced .–Davey2010 • (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like it was created by himself or a relative. (A longer version exists at SPA User_talk:Grampajerryco/sandbox) Totally violates BLP. LaMona (talk) 15:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above and fails WP:BIO and lacks sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.