Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Fields (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 28bytes (talk) 04:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Fields[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. No sources which do not fail WP:ROUTINE, WP:GEOSCOPE or WP:IRS attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. The previous AfD closed with two Keep proponents incorrectly asserting that the subject met the requirements of NHOCKEY, which was not the case even before the criteria were tightened up. Ravenswing 20:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A search still turns up no sources that pass GNG and they still fail NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 00:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ravenswing and Djsasso. Reso lute 16:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.