Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvation Army Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salvation Army Radio[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized article about an internet radio station, not properly referenced as passing WP:BCAST. As always, internet radio services are not automatically deemed notable just because they exist, but must be able to show reliably sourced analysis of their significance -- but the references here are entirely to the station's own self-published content about itself on its own website, with no evidence of third-party media coverage about it. And further, the article was created by an WP:SPA with a direct conflict of interest. Bearcat (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did multiple searches and dug through many pages of results. I was unable to find any independent Reliable Sources with any significant coverage. There may have been a single passing mention, but it was so short I didn't bother to check if it was even a match. Alsee (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Now defunct, non-notable internet radio station. I could not find a single IRS via a ProQuest database search of Australian and New Zealand newspapers (deeper and broader than Google). Fails WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 02:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.