Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvation (video game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Salvation (video game)[edit]
- Salvation (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An unreleased game from a redlinked manufacturer with no credible independent sources. WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOT a directory of video games that will be out Real Soon Now. Guy (Help!) 21:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — No verifiable, third-party sources establishing any spot of notability (the sources directly from their site does not quailify). In addition, more crystalballery. Why do people insist that Wikipedia is supposed to be a skeletal database website like Gamespot and IGN? MuZemike (talk) 22:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Strong Keep — The game is announced see here, [1], here, here, here and here. There is enough coverage for the game. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Gamespot source alone is good enough for me. I've added it to the article. --Ged UK (talk) 15:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, article is sourced now and needed sourcing in the first place, not deletion. --Reinoutr (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 17:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.