Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salman Shah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 00:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Shah[edit]

Salman Shah dosen't seems to meet a noteable. I am also living in Pakistan, never heard the name of this chap more then two times. A M. Khan 19:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. The article be speedy deleted, as I don't think Salman Shah meets the criterai to have separate page for him. A M. Khan 19:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A simple search finds thousands of news stories and references to him. Fan-1967 19:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. That nomination looks like a joke to me. The person has a status of a Federal Minister in Pakistan and is the architect of economic reforms in Pakistan. Ceratinly passes the Google test. Also Fulfills the criteria of WP:BIO. --Marwatt 20:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Dlete There are many advisors to PM of Pakistan at the moment. Advisors are having no values. Just before a month, Punjab High Court dismissed the status of many of the Advisors of Chief Minister Chaudhary Pervez Elahi. This shows that advisors seems to be nothing, except whatthey are working in current government. They are not elected members nor they have legislation rights. Nor Salam Shah is answerable to both houses of Parliament of Pakistan, National Assembly and Senate. So to best of my knowledge, a strong dlete should be recommended. Otherwise, nothing harmful in this article Begu Khel 21:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)) This is a defintetly a sock-puppet, a new account. Whenever and wherever User:A M. Khan wants to initiate a bad faith AFD, this sock puppet or some other which he has created creep in to balance the scale in his favor. --Marwatt 14:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Strong keep per WP:BIO. Like it or not he is notable according to Google. MartinDK 21:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Apparently a bad faith nomination. The nominator may be warned for nominating articles indiscriminately. He is one of the top Finance Officials in the Government of Pakistan. Meets the criteria of WP:BIO.--Mina Khel 22:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC) This is a sock-puppet, a new account. Whenever and wherever User:Marwatt needs this I.D comes in and saves his cause. [reply]
Comments There are many things listed in Google but they aren't notable things to be pasted on Wikipedia. Whatever Begu Khel claims is right, many advisors were dimissed. So the article be speedy deleted. Just yesterday, many other Advisors of Chief Minister of Punjab were thrown away. You can make easy search in google for this news.)) Regards A M. Khan 16:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC).)) This appears to be a drama comment by User:A M. Khan so as to show as if User:Begu Khel is not his sock puppet. --Marwatt 22:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletions. --Marwatt 00:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep- It is ridiculous to nominate this type of articles to Afd. Really a notable person. He had visited India with President Mushraaff . Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 14:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepI don't see the reasoning behind this nomination, he is de facto Finance Minister of Pakistan, and a front like spokesperson of the GOP on finance issues. While I find him boring and to technical he is without a doubt worth a mention on wiki. --Zak 23:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.