Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salman Muqtadir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like the consensus is that the sources do not justify an article due to e.g reliability concerns. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Muqtadir[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are not to reliable sources; I can't find evidence of notability. CapitalSasha ~ talk 21:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and for poor quality of writing. — Jeff G. ツ 12:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is not need to be delete because this is an article about a Bangladeshi Youtuber. The reference are valid by source. All the information are right. So tell me how to stop ″Nomination of Salman Muqtadir for deletion″. If you need evidence then here is Proof. The proof reference from The Daily Star newspaper. It is the high-quality website of Bangladesh. Thank You Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 13:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Siddiq Sazzad is the Creator of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.45.19 (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.-Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't meet notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.45.19 (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Per nom. Non notable and poor, promotional writing style. No rationale to keep this article. - Mar11 (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Per nom. No reliable sources.--119.30.47.115 (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.