Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally McDonough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No credible policy based rationale offered by those calling for keep. SpinningSpark 18:20, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sally McDonough[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable BLP constructed from primary sources. CorporateM (Talk) 18:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete - Unsourced BLP of a subject failing our General Notability Guideline. Carrite (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – For notability. I think every top adviser in the White House is notable. The press secretary is probably the top adviser to the First Lady, so that passes. We have an article on Hannah August, Michelle Obama's press secretary, who has had a similar career. So I cleaned up the external links and now it has 2 references to White House archives. ~~However, several paragraphs in the article are word-for-word copies of the second reference, so I tagged that. If those aren't cleaned up it will have to be stubbed as copyvio.~~ – Margin1522 (talk) 13:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article appears to be autobiographical, having been created by Smcd5. The only cites are to White House announcements -- which, BTW, are not copyvio because of being Federal documents and thus in public domain. LaMona (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks, that's a good point. I removed the copypaste tag. – Margin1522 (talk) 15:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 17:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I did a few minutes of searching, but cannot find sources supporting notability. Certainly she got cited as a spokesperson for Mrs. Bush, but there are no profiles of her. And not much to get from things like the link to her in India (cat): "In a statement to the press regarding India's death, Sally McDonough, a spokesperson for First Lady Laura Bush, noted that the family was "deeply saddened" by their cat's death." What we have here is more of a WP:LINKEDIN profile than a viable BLP.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are enough sources to prove notability. Any advisor to a US president is notable. AlbinoFerret 16:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.