Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salima Khudhair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salima Khudhair[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough mentions to pass WP:GNG. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 14:16, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per WP:ANYBIO. The lack of inline citations also contravenes WP:BLP. DrStrauss talk 14:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: And a total bank also rasies concerns about her notability. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Of the citations: baretly.net is self-published and has hardly any views, and elcinema.com is a listings/IMDb type of site. Neither looks in any way WP:RS. algardenia.com looks as if it could be WP:RS on some topics, but being in Arabic I find it very difficult to assess. The citation relates to a presentation she gave in 2012 at a forum of intellectuals and artists, describing her career. I don't consider it sufficient evidence of notability even if WP:RS. The corresponding Arabic article has no sources at all. A Google search for her name in Arabic turned up a couple of news items from this decade, but no in-depth coverage. If there are WP:RS sources, they're likely to be printed and in Arabic - but that doesn't get over the hurdle of WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. Fails WP:NBIO.

Poor presentation of sources may contravene WP:BLP, but is not a reason to delete. If an article meets WP:NBIO, it can be improved. Narky Blert (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.