Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salah Eddine Saadouni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salah Eddine Saadouni[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable director, article deleted a week ago for failing to demonstrate notability. Nothing in this version suggests a pass of WP:GNG. nearlyevil 665 11:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - badly fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE; zero coverage in WP:RS; only self-published sources available thus far. In addition, he has never been involved in a notable production. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have a feeling the author of this page is unaware how Wikipedia works and is trying to shut down this discussion by placing this on the nominated article's talk page. I reverted that as potential vandalism and issued a warning, and the author proceeded to place three identical fake keep tags on their own user talk page. I'm very confused. nearlyevil 665 12:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm even more confused. Now a user with only 1 edit posted the exact same fake tag on their user talk page. I assume they created a sockpuppet account to put up these useless fake keep notices. nearlyevil 665 12:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nearlyevil665 - really odd. Never seen anything like it before. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is a WP:SPAMPAGE, no independent coverage found whatsoever, and no indication of notability. SailingInABathTub (talk) 13:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per the above. ColinBear (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - looks like a vanity page to me. With only self-published and user-generated sources supporting the statements of the article and nothing that can be found that qualifies as substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources, the subject fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. --Ashley yoursmile! 15:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One French article, one in Arab I can't read and that's all I can find. Non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 18:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails WP:GNG + WP:CREATIVE + no WP:RS at all CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.