Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal Calabro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sal Calabro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:Academic Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is named dropped one time in [1] a biography of Howard Stern. As best I can tell he is just mentioned in passing once in this book on p. 93. That just is not the level of coverage to show notability. It might be the one thing that pushes us past GNG if we had a bunch of other sources, but on its own it is not enough. The sourcing we have in the article plus that also does not add to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.