Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakett Saawhney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. See Draft:Sakett Saawhney Missvain (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sakett Saawhney[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created by sockpuppets of Adnanjavidkhan1, and the article completely skipped the AfC process. I think the article's notability needs to be evaluted, knowing that the socks behind the article have been blocked in other projects for being a promotional account. CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 23:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 23:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 23:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 23:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article appears to be notable but based on what CrystallineLeMonde said I was defer the article back to the AfC process.--Blurz (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this diff shows that the user removed the AfC tags and moved the article to mainspace. --CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He has worked in many films. Passes GNG. Priyanjali singh (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The issue is that the article was moved into mainspace before even got reviewed, and also, there's a significant amount of sockpuppetry in the edit history of the article. See the page history and the SPI page for Adnanjavidkhan1 (sockmaster). A page created by the same sock category also have been nominated for deletion.

My suggestion would be to draftify this article and let people improve the article where it becomes a normal article once again.--CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 11:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 03:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: Even though the nomination does not give any proper reasons to delete the article, the subjects references show barely the minimum of notability required and weirdly enough, I cannot find any sources myself. Whatever the case, if this article were to be kept, it would need major rewriting and copyediting. He has only produced 4 films and has not yet gained his significant place in the industry, therefore not passing WP:FILMMAKER. He may pass WP:GNG, but that can be argued as I cannot find even one source about him. Coreykai (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.