Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saket Agarwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saket Agarwal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any reliable secondary sources. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 01:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable person. Did not find any single reliable reference, which shows the notability.Jussychoulex (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - to company article. ukexpat (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 00:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, and a very poor article too. Since there's nothing to be said about him besides that he has a job, the rest of it is hopeless trivia, including (among other fun facts) that he was "pretty good" at badminton in school. I am not making this up, it really is in there! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:Notability (people). MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.