Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjid Mitha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sajjid Mitha[edit]
- Sajjid Mitha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable businessman, the sources are either unreliable/self published or barely mention his name. WP:COI, WP:AUTOBIO and WP:ADVERT issues. I can't find any substantial, reliable and independent sources confirming that Mr. Sajjid Mitha meets our notability requirements. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:BIO/WP:GNG. However, this source and this source, which name Mitha as some kind of "honorary trade adviser" to Thailand make me think there may be more here than meets the eye. Nonetheless, from what I can see, Mitha still lacks the coverage to get notability, and the article as written is virtually unrecoverable from a WP:NOT perspective. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Some of these sources like Free Press Release aren't reliable. Those that are mention the company in passing, but I don't think this individual passes WP:Notability (people). MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.