Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Jani (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Star Mississippi 02:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sajjad Jani[edit]

Sajjad Jani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single reference meets WP:RS. Seems like an AUTOBIO. Saqib (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Internet, and Pakistan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I had made this draft and it was published by someone before the review. After a discussion, the history was merged and since then multiple edits were made by different people. And I too have been reworking on it after that, by adding back the information. I have added references published by news outlets of different countries e.g. DunyaNews, Teyit and AFP fact check. I am working on few other reliable sources as well, to make the article better and I would appreciate if other people here too could help or guide, in making it a better article than deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorOfData (talkcontribs) 11:39, June 17, 2023 (UTC)
    Sajjad is prominent artist in Pakistan and India (in Urdu/Punjabi audience). Many TV channels including Pakistan state TV channel [1] has recognized his work and for the past many months, weekend editions of newspapers publish about his programs [2] [3] [4] [5] (the pictures of artist with Urdu details are mentioned in the e-newspaper links, while for the English readers, the YouTube channel link with translation is here, showing the same pictures, as in the newspapers). HMGelani (talk) 16:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I am a student and made account to polish creative writing/editing, so can't scrutinize much but I had part in discussion on Wikipedia regarding this article and draft, so I am a bit familiar with this. Sajjad Jani is a popular TV/Youtube personality and the news websites like DunyaNews are also national level news outlets, that have been mentioned in references. DoctorOfData (talk) 15:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet, sockmaster given timeout. signed, Rosguill talk 05:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: It has multiple citations, also it need multiple reliable citations for this article. CastJared (talk) 08:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I know this article need some improvements. also need some good authentic references. but i will try to improve it in best possible way. Sajjad Jani is a noticeable and prominent celebrity in Pakistan. So this article deserve to be on Wikipedia with some required improvements. Jagmit Singh Brar 11:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagmit Singh Brar (talkcontribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as two participants are blocked and the other two are relatively new editors. Hoping to get some opinions from experienced editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify. This page is a little over a month old, and it looks like it may have contentiously been moved from draft to main namespace, back to draft, and then forcibly moved back to main namespace on some possibly misunderstood wiki-legalese grounds. The community specifically allows for incubation instead of deletion. I believe this would neither be a backdoor deletion, nor would be an inappropriate use of the draft namespace. Additionally, there are non-English sources presented in this AfD that may be difficult to evaluate, so AfC may be a better path for this potential article. —siroχo 07:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Assuming this fellow was as important as claimed in this discussion, I was expecting much more content but this is a very skimpy article. It would benefit from more time in Draft space where interested editors could spend time actually building up an article that demonstrated why they thought he was significant. I don't see it right now. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify - not ready for article space, most of the references are from a single incident of mistaken identity which does not really support notability in my opinion. - Indefensible (talk) 01:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.