Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajid Yahiya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 08:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sajid Yahiya[edit]

Sajid Yahiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and sources Anoop 20:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The article is notable as of WP:NACTOR, you can read more about him at [1], and on [2] it states 'He has acted in nearly 18 movies which include films like Bangalore days, Pakida etc', and on [3] it clearly states Sajid Yahiya has done noted roles in 'Bangalore Days' and 'Pakida'. Also via WP:INADFD you can find lot of links stating the directional debut and about his movies.JackTracker (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Keep as sources have been found above, the deccan chronicle article is significant coverage,as is the hindu article already in the article, passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: It's not clear that the Bangalore Days or Pakida roles are more than minor ones, and the NR source appears of questionable reliability. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.