Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajad H Hamdani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sajad H Hamdani[edit]

Sajad H Hamdani is [[WP:PERMAORPHAN|Permanent WP:Orphan since January 2011. Terribly written article, although typical of the vanity gumpf that seems to be written by Indians in Wikipedia, remove that and it's "he's an artist" and teacher at the Institute of Music and Fine Arts, Srinagar which itself has no article, and the references are all rubbish too. Barney the barney barney (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete The article text just indicates that the subject completed a degree and has a job. The WP:ARTIST criteria require much more than that, and I have found no evidence that ths person meets these. AllyD (talk) 20:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Dead links, no sources found. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The subject has a relatively large digital footprint in terms of social media, which are also listed here on the page. It could possibly be a vanity page -thus a violation of WP:ADVERT if I am not mistaken. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.