Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints in Hell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saints in Hell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. No sources provided and I can't find any either. If you're interested, look through the article history before I got to it--but you may not find anything there that makes this band notable, not even the pyrotechnics mishap or the bathroom 'incident'. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep per 7th notability criteria for bands (Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians). Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 11:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- But can we even verify that fact? Drmies (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails almost all criteria for bands, except #7, which isn't verifiable. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Band features three notable members and is important in since that's where the people who would later form Cinderella started. Terveetkadet (talk) 02:32, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ultimately this assertion needs verification, which is lacking. Good-faith attempts to do so seem to have failed. I'm not advocating one way or the other, pending further research, but at the same time, if it's unverifiable, it needs to go. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I remember reading about Saints in Hell and the "bathroom incident" in Circus Magazine back in the day in some articles related to Cinderealla but can't find the magazine... Will post the references if I get ahold of it. It's likely that there is more print sources available that haven't been made available online given the era in which the band were active. 24.122.252.160 (talk) 04:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Added some references... In the circumstances of a band from 1980, 1981, 1982, I think it's good. More references exist in printed metal magazines from the '80's. If you have them, post them. Cause this band is notable for featuring many future members of Cinderella and Britny Fox. 24.122.252.160 (talk) 05:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Armbrust. GregJackP Boomer! 03:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidacne of notability.Slatersteven (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions). SnottyWong ^speak 16:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Armbrust. Clearly not notable. Article is completely unwikified and reads like a copyvio. SnottyWong ^speak 16:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.