Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Danube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Saint Danube

Saint Danube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Vanispamcruft SPA created Saint Danube, Saint Danube, issue NO 1 and Saint Danube, issue NO 2 as promo for a non-notable magazine. The last two have been deleted per A1 (Not enough context to identify article's subject); but I think Saint Danube should be deleted too. Searching "Saint Danube" on Google gives me 178 results. I think the "real" name of this magazine is Sveti Dunav which gives me 348 results on Google.

The magazine was started by a nongovernment and non profit organization called: "World and Danube" (811 Google hits). It is possible that the NGO is notable, Unesco.org proofs it exists, but their magazine is not notable. The author used the same pattern of articles on a foreign language wiki.

References

Kwiki (talk) 08:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; the magazine isn't notable 龗 (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - evidence exists, but no reliable sources exists to prove it is notable. Bearian (talk) 15:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - As you said, the magazine doesn't seem very notable. Also, the information provided is almost entirely in the form of an advertisement. Br3k (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.