Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Joseph of Reims

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Joseph of Reims[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:GNG, promo, cut-and-paste translation with dodgy results. The Banner talk 11:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If they're copy-paste translating whole sections from their handbooks and websites, then it should be tagged for copyvio and the article needs to have WP:TNT before considering deletion. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, "cut-and-paste translation" as in "a quick translation without checking the sources". The Banner talk 22:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 16:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Matt14451 (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is a transaltion of the French article, here. It is entirely comprehensible to me. If there are issues with the translation that is a matter for clean-up fixing and is not a ground for deletion. The French article has been around since September 2010 and there is no indication of copyright concerns over there. This is a historic school and, whilst the article would benefit from more independent sources, a search on the French titles, as well as the English, shows up sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk)
Keep I too find it extremely frustrating when I find cut and paste translations. Nevertheless, keep as above. Pjposullivan (talk) 21:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.