Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saige Thompson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 17:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saige Thompson[edit]

Not a glimmer of an assertion of notability for this person. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for every insignificant actress to have ever landed a role. No significant coverage in WP:RS, so no WP:V. Fails WP:BIO.

Delete. Fails WP:BIO. Has not had any important or significant acting roles. How did this pass last time?--brew crewer (yada, yada) 08:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Yada yada is correct, Brewcrewer. You ask "How did this pass last time?". Because people voted to keep it, that's how. I support the compelling arguments for it in the first AFD. 222.153.66.182 (talk) 08:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- — 222.153.66.182 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. {{unsigned User:Brewcrewer}}
  - I, user:222.153.66.182 have in fact made hundreds of edits "outside this topic". It so happens that when I edit I am assigned a thingy, and it is always has a different number. That is why when I sign off this time I am User:222.153.69.207. And no, it is none of your business that I prefer to not create an "account".
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:BIO - "Significant role in notable television series", emphasis added. Life On A Stick may not be the most significant TV show ever, but we have an article on it - ergo, it's deemed to be notable. If the notability of the TV show is in question, then its article should be up for AfD instead. Tevildo (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As per Tevildo. matt91486 (talk) 20:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - According to WP:BIO, an actor with a significant role in a notable production would pass. As part of the regular cast of a TV show, she meets the element of having a significant role. The show itself was covered in the media, for example this USA Today article so I would say that there is notability to the show meeting the condition of notable production. -- Whpq (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.