Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saigado Publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saigado Publishing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable one-person dōjinshi "circle." Fails WP:NOTE, WP:ORG, and WP:CREATIVE. Being self-published and sold in small numbers at events like Comiket, dōjinshi rarely receives coverage by reliable third-party sources except in exceptional circumstances. —Farix (t | c) 11:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 11:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 11:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article contains three things: the mention of his work as a character designer, original research, and redlinks to non-notable H works. Removing the redlinks and OR results in a two-sentence stub with nothing in it other than duplication of content that should be in the production section of Boku no Pico anyway. --erachima talk 12:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to the anime/manga Wikia. Or to Wikia Annex. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 05:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not appropriate to transwiki something that is a WP:BLP violation. —Farix (t | c) 11:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - You didn't claim a BLP violation in the deletion rationale. And this is a group (of one), rather than a bio. (ie. a corporation of one employee) 76.66.193.119 (talk) 04:52, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ORG and WP:N -- AnmaFinotera (talk ~ contribs) 04:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not see any potential in this article as it is non-notable. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.