Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saheed Aderinto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saheed Aderinto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. He is just doing his job. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 10:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too soon. --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PROF, does not appear to pass WP:GNG. St Anselm (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient accomplishments for WP:PROF. DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Assistant professor is usually WP:TOOSOON for notability and this article does not provide evidence for being an exception. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.