Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Nahak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sagar Nahak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is totally 'unencyclopedic', with lots of POV. Challengethelimits (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - creator and sole editor is a WP:SPA (who has tried to create a redirect to Facebook) and google gets me nothing. Neonchameleon (talk) 17:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per reasons already listed. I couldn't find anything worthwhile, either. GRUcrule (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: all of the references given in the article (other than the Facebook one and the one that isn't properly formatted) are articles which talk about Arijit Singh, and don't mention Sagar Nahak at all. There is no link between the two indicated that I can see. Is "Arijit Singh" a stage name, or are these just nonsense sources? Ivanvector (talk) 22:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article was copy of another singer's article Arijit Singh. Have stripped it down now. Looks delete worthy. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under criterion A7. With all of the content removed which was not about this person in the first place, all that's left is a link to the Facebook profile of a non-notable person. Ivanvector (talk) 18:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.