Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saffron Coomber (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns. Stifle (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saffron Coomber[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page was deleted after an AfD in January 2010, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saffron Coomber. Recently a prod and a CSD G4 tags were contested by an anonymous IP. As far as I can see, an actress with a few minor roles, insifficient coverage to pass WP:BIO. Also, given the article's history, perhaps protecting against recreation is warranted. Nsk92 (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 16:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, or redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns and protect. The IP that recreated the article is now blocked as a sock of User:Anna2123456789 who has been recreating deleted articles out of process and undoing redirects arrived at by consensus. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 17:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not tag the page under CSD G4 since I don't have access to the previously deleted version and was not sure if the current version is "sufficiently identical". I am fine with speedy deletion of the page, but I also think that salting it to protect against recreation may be appropriate in this case. Nsk92 (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Arbitrarily0 was the admin who originally deleted the article after the first AfD, we could always drop them a note to check the two versions....Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 20:24, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and Protect as seems to be the custom with these problematic articles by now. Fails WP:N. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.