Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safety siping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete - copyvio, and also, replace with a redirect to siping per the talk page Talk:Safety siping --HappyCamper 01:25, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Safety siping[edit]

A blatant ad. Delete. Owen× ☎ 21:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up and move to Siping, with Chinese city already there moved to Siping (city). A discussion of the siping process would be encyclopedic and relevant, although I agree with the nom that the page as it is now is a blatant advertisement. Speedy delete as copyvio. I've created a proper article at siping.--chris.lawson 23:56, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article unless rewritten. Also a copyvio. Thue | talk 21:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't check for copyvio, but if it is—please Speedy it under CSD:A8. Owen× ☎ 21:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete if possible, delete otherwise. Deltabeignet 21:26, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, i removed the content of the page as it is listed as a copyvio dr.alf 00:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.