Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saeed Ganji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saeed Ganji[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cross-wiki promotion The article is created by a sock that is closed globally(Special:CentralAuth/Amr.ataeii) And it seems to have been created in exchange for wages and this issue has not been disclosed by the user.This person is not a professional fighter and is in the resources of advertising websites. Pklp (talk) 22:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pklp (talk) 22:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.--Pklp (talk) 22:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:It seems that the article was created by ArmanAfifeh Socks because the person's article in Sample was created by Khadempour322 Socks.
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He clearly doesn't meet WP:NMMA since he has no top tier fights. None of the references constitute significant independent coverage--it's all databases, routine sports reporting, and two links to the same interview. Papaursa (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete I agree with the User:Papaursa exactly that he does not meet WP:NMMA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.124.114.175 (talk) 01:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete no indication that the subject meets GNG.--Pklp (talk) 09:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Heavy delete Per all above and checking Farsi sources related to the subject Mardetanha (talk) 14:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.