Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacrifice (2011)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Neither of the keep !votes actually present an argument for keeping. postdlf (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sacrifice (2011)[edit]
- Sacrifice (2011) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable future sports event. PROD removed with statement: "we do this for every WWE and TNA PPV more will be added when more information becomes available". No evidence of notability Jezhotwells (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's such a problem for TNA pages but ohh WWE can have the same page and it's up and normal for example this page Over the Limit (2011) it's an exact copy of Sacrifice page nothing but the poster and information a the bottom changed I don't see you deleting those pages but your quick to delete a TNA page. Zanwifi (talk) 00:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for pointing that out, I have nominated that one for deletion as well. There is nothing to indicate notability of this event or the other. Can you provide any evidence of that? Jezhotwells (talk) 00:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see anything notable about the event, and the few details in the article are not supported by the cited sources. In general, I do not see how most individual pay-per-view events could meet the notability guidelines. I think there is also the question of whether this is simply advertising for the event; if another admin agrees I'm willing to speedy this under G11. -- Donald Albury 00:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Or failing that merge all the TNA Sacrifice articles into one. Perhaps this may be a better general idea? Merge all relevant pro wrestling PPVs into single articles, eg. all the relevant Sacrifice articles, all the relevant TNA Lockdown articles, all the Summerslam articles etc etc? NXT Fan (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merger may well be the answer as it appears that the individual events don't have notability. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Its less then a month away no reason to delete when the background will begin to be made on Thursday. STATic message me! 01:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you address the notability of this subject? Jezhotwells (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.