Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Blaze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (Nomination withdrawn.) Marasmusine (talk) 14:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Blaze[edit]

Contested PROD. I use the same rationale in the prod: I cannot find any verifiable sources for this future-released game as shown here. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; it may be suitable for inclusion at a later time when reliable sources pop up, but not now. MuZemike 16:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 16:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —MuZemike 16:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no third-party sources given. Alexius08 (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- If it's for real, eventually someday some reliable sources will be there and it can be readded. No reason to have an article in the meantime. DreamGuy (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. Schuym1 (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are definitely some sources which cover the game: RPGFan, Dengeki, Famitsu, Gamespot. SharkD (talk) 09:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination and WP:TROUT myself for not searching under the Japanese name. MuZemike 17:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, careful where you wave that fish about -- it hurts! —Quasirandom (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try to minimize the collateral damage :) MuZemike 19:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case it's needed: keep based on SharkD's citations. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.