Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin lokapure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 and WP:CSD#G5 -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sachin lokapure[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability, and WP:BASIC. He has some papers listed in Google Scholar but not nothing highly cited (highest number of citations is four). Fails WP:NACADEMICS. Jbh (talk) 11:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin G Lokapure for the reasoning. Jerod Lycett (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, pinging them, @Wgolf:, @Velella:, @Optakeover:, @Ohnoitsjamie:, @Pharaoh of the Wizards:, @Lakun.patra:, @Tigraan:, and @Bakerstmd: an article you voted on before is back at AfD. Jerod Lycett (talk) 23:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy as this was deleted already as well as SP. Wgolf (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I tagged the article db-g4 Jbh (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As before. BakerStMD 23:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per CSD G4. Optakeover ^(Talk) 01:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G4; nothing substantially different from last version. Please promote yourself elsewhere. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.