Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabalom Glitz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Redirection can be discussed on the article talk page. v/r - TP 21:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Sabalom Glitz[edit]
- Sabalom Glitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor recurring character from the 1980s incarnation of the BBC serial Doctor Who. Fails the WP:GNG. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Pointless nomination, should be discussed on the article talk page or boldly merged with e.g. List of Doctor Who supporting characters if it is believed insufficiently notable for own article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim! (talk • contribs) 07:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:33, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per
the anonymousTim!'s suggestion above - Go to the talk page & discuss it.......
- →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, discuss, maybe redir. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per Tim! Obvious outcome. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.