Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saanvi Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saanvi Kumar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Power Cats: The Mission Begins. GAB^gab 01:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I was actually trying to nominate this for deletion when GAB apparently beat me to it. No reliable sources found on Google, and only Wikipedia shows up if you Google the author's name and that of their book. Fails GNG, BIO, and other notability guidelines. Everymorning (talk) 01:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is sourced only to the subjects own web page and the publisher webpage. The publisher, RiverHouse, does print on demand and e-book publishing, so this looks to be basically a 9-year-old (although I am not sure the age is verrified), who at her own initiative or with the urgiging of well placed family members (I remember one book where it was somewhat celebrated that a 16-year-old had gotten published by a major publisher, but both his parents were book editors, so some questioned how meaningful this was), who published a book through what is essentially a plat form to self-published. Nothing here at all close to notability. My google search was so stymied by other Saanvi Kumar's I don't think I found anything on this one, nothing indicating notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability per WP: AUTHOR. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.