Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saadia Sehar Haidari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No further discussion of sources provided despite two relists So Why 12:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saadia Sehar Haidari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not many WP:RS to verify her biography per WP:V. No notable award, only a mention in journalism website which writes about local journalists. Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. Greenbörg (talk) 09:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. she fails to meet WP:GNG because of no coverage in RS and fails WP:AUTHOR. --Saqib (talk) 10:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:GNG met. 1 2 3. Article could use expansion and improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First source is self published. --Saqib (talk) 06:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.