Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STEMployable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

STEMployable[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to establish notability - see WP:ORG. Lack of information on them on the web - only a Twitter and Youtube by the looks of it. [1] covers the company - but is only a copy from the trademark register. A domain launching in 2017 seems to be WP:TOOSOON TheMagikCow (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON as the website is not even active yet Seasider91 (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable service mark for a planned future enterprise (also non-notable). The eight references in the article relate to STEM education and employment, not to article subject. WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.