Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SP Nano Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SP Nano Ltd.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. No significant coverage, only coverage is routine PR announcements. Article is strictly promotional in nature. Rogermx (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - reads like a press release, sources don't establish notability Dexxtrall (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom no reliable coverage available. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed as per nom. Routine coverage (as per their funding announcements. Lovelife11111 (talk) 11:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable coverage. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:19, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I strongly believe it should be deleted because reliable sources are week and this article written just for advertisement purpose.TheDreamBoat (talk) 02:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sources are not significant enough.--Geshem Bracha (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.