Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SP77 46-44

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SP77 46-44[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely relies on large-scale surveys and therefore does not meet WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG due to not having significant coverage in scientific papers. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 19:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources found. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the only sources which exist for this star are surveys and databases, which do not have any WP:SIGCOV of the subject or establish notability. The star fails WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 08:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: only coverage is limited, trivial mentions in papers ([1], [2]) or routine coverage from databases, etc. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.