Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable award. No refs. PROD removed with a google url which returns four hits, none of which appear to mention this award. Other searching reveals a handful or forum posts and wiki entries. Nothing reliable and nothing in depth. Note that this appears to be part of a series of related articles which may have similar issues. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: Stunning, how nominator could ignore 865,000 hits in google with hundreds of WP:RS sources: Click -> It doesn't make any sense to exclude particular Award categories. They are all part of the same Award show as clearly documented at www.siima.in and other sources. -- Dravidian Hero 10:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:GHITS for why that's not an appropaite answer at AfD. Note also that that search isn't for information about this topic, since the search string is "South Indian International Movie Awards"; Googling for "South Indian International Movie Awards Award for Best Debutant Producer" gives me zero hits and "SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer" appears to only give me this page republished by third parties. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Dravidianhero above. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 00:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, if the nominator feels that these are "non-notable award(s)" he should first nominate for deletion the main article South Indian International Movie Awards and not just one of its legitimate spinout articles. First the head, then the body. Cavarrone 06:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quite the reverse. South Indian International Movie Awards has references, which this doesn't. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, if you yourself consider South Indian International Movie Awards as notable, I don't see which is your point about this spinout article, except it is unsourced. Yes, it is an unsourced article about a notable award (same as, eg, BAFTA Award for Best Makeup and Hair), and this is not a reason to delete it. Cavarrone 08:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.