Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHPE de ASU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SHPE de ASU[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An individual college chapter is simply not notable enough for an article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, possible speedy. Hairhorn (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In reading the guidelines, my understanding was that my username could not be associated or reference my organization. As I understood it, I had to create a new user name to edit the article. I do not believe I am being biased about the organization, I may need to change the wording of a few lines to remove personalization, but I am trying expand on what was already in existence.

This page was created 20 December 2007 and had largely remained unedited prior to 12 April 2012. Everything on the article save for updated awards for 2012 and the History section was in existence long before I started editing. I don't understand what the problem is?

An individual college chapter is simply not notable enough for an article. — RHaworth

If this is the case, this article should have been deleted long ago.

Could you please list out things I might be violating or advise on what I could to prevent deletion? Directing me Deletion Policy and additonal information to read is not very helpful.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowlight9 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence that this specific chapter is notable independent of the parent organisation. Note that Wikipedia has many articles, some which do not meet inclusion guidelines, but until somebody notices, then the article will remain. The length of time an article has been on Wikipedia is not evidence for notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.