Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SE Ranking (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 02:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SE Ranking[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable company. The references are Crunchbase (generally agreed to not be suitable for meeting WP:CORPDEPTH) and a sponsored post by this company. Other coverage (such as The Next Web [1] or BoingBoing [2]) is also sponsored/promo/commission sales. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There were initially 11 references, most of which were even spammier. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:30, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6 9 03:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6 9 03:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6 9 03:09, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6 9 03:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gogashville44 23:32, 27 August 2018 (UTC)thank you for the review. I've added quite a few links to the non-sponsored publications about this company. I'm creating articles about IT tools that I feel are important for general public to know about. Tried to re-write the content to respect the guidelines. I would appreciate a secon look at the article and further suggestion on how else to improve so it stays on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogashville44 (talk • contribs)
Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesnt have significant coverage, fails WP:GNG, and WP:NCORP. Also, per the previous AfD. —usernamekiran(talk) 09:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gogashville44 12:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)so, if you are suggesting to delete my page you have to be fair and delete all the others that are very similar to mine. i've removed all the promo content, added links to significant resource (and might find some more); the info in this article does bring valuable information to wiki readers. some examples of the very similar companies as the one I'm writing about (and it's just a very few I've picked from the same category): SEMrush Serpstat Sprinklr Profile Defenders SocialFlow Moz (marketing software) Brand.com Wpromote — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogashville44 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources fdo not meet the standards of WP:NCORP--they seem mostly to be based on press releases or offer only incidental coverage. But I do agree with yje article contributor that a good number of the other articles they mention probably should be deleted also. We have quite a bit on junk in WP, accumulated when standards were lower; it will take a while to remove all of it, but the least we can do is not add tp it. DGG ( talk ) 05:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.