Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEP Backup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SEP Backup[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software developed by a German company (with a US subsidiary). I was only able to find 1 German-language review (remaining Google hits are press releases, advertorials and passing mentions). Current sources are not independent. A trivial user poll by Gartner (removed) doesn't help to establish notability. GermanJoe (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I find no significant coverage. Fails WP:NORG by a wide margin. Rentier (talk) 11:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment for clarity: the added Evaluator Group link doesn't appear to be an "independent" source (as Wikipedia uses the term for notability discussions). The firm does reviews for hire in close cooperation with the reviewed companies. Such reviews may be used for uncontroversial information, but they are not considered truely independent sources to establish notability. GermanJoe (talk) 12:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and GermanJoe Daask (talk) 13:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.