Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEER Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 09:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SEER Interactive[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable campany. None of the references has in depth independent coverage. The closest is this piece which is one paragraph of puffery with no actual evidence of independent journalism or a by-line. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, I suppose I'll chime in as it seems my adding to the Companies project provoked this fast. They're a small company (maybe like ~50 employees? source: their site), but one that makes a lot of noise beyond that piece (mainly just speaking at conferences - MozCon, LinkLove). No idea if that makes them notable though. BrandonSaad (talk) 20:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'makes a lot of noise' is a synonym of 'has good PR people' and is essentially unrelated to WP:Notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Leaving aside these best/coolest place to work chaff items which are susceptible to PR and mean very little anyway, I did find one piece (now referenced in the article) via Highbeam which described them as "one leading independent SEO firm" (in 2007). But that is a firm going about its business - I am not finding anything to indicate encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 06:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.