Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAREL Supplies & Services for Medicine Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SAREL Supplies & Services for Medicine Ltd.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article, as it stands, is slightly promotional (though not so blatant as to merit CSD, in my opinion). It cites the company's English-translated webpage as a main souce, and some wording is taken directly from the site. CSD may be an appropriate alternative, but an open discussion here might allow for more input/sources. dci | TALK 19:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a minor Israeli purchasing group with 115 employees. The article tries to sound more important than it is. For example founded under a Government Decree just means that it complies with the law regarding formation of group purchasing organizations. It is not the sole supplier to the Ministry of Health. Delete for lack of notability per WP:ORG. --Bejnar (talk) 20:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. 15:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I managed to find a single source for it, in Globes, a financial newspaper. However, one source is not enough to qualify as significant coverage, and the subject does not seem to meet the general notability criteria. I imagine that most of the secondary sources, if they are out there, aren't in English. Hopefully, someone who's familiar with the Hebrew language can double check to make sure.--xanchester (t) 02:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.