Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. K. Mohanty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
S. K. Mohanty[edit]
- S. K. Mohanty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability; the references are (unreliable) Mohanty papers, not neutral sources; websearches show up nothing to support notability —EncMstr (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although there is some claim of notability by stating his won award, I can find no information about this to verify this, or to even show that the award itself is notable. The only references provided are to papers written by the article's subject, and thus may fall under having only first party sources. On another note, even if it is decided to keep the article, it would have to be largely rewritten, as it is currently written like an advertisment. Rorshacma (talk) 18:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete promo article that fails WP:BIO 184.33.223.198 (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.