Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Brett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all. - Bobet 18:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S. Brett, R. Brett, Bob and Sarah V.S. Vietnam[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Two articles about a brother-and-sister amateur film duo, and one about their unreleased film. The two bio articles have a weak (albeit grandiose) assertion of notability as filmmakers, so they do not seem speedy-able. Nothing verifiable on any of these per Google. Website is on Tripod. All dePRODed without comment. Delete all. Kinu ^t/_c 03:14, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vanitising. Royboy crashfan 03:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nom Duckster 03:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Eivind 04:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There are plenty of nn movies on IMDB, and if you're not even on there... -- Imban 05:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 05:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity, non-notable--Vercalos 07:36, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-04 07:51Z
Delete all per Imban — no IMDb presence for any of these. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 09:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete! Ive heard about these guys! theyre legit! there must be somethin wrong with their website or something if its not on google. I know its on the IMDB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.50.176 (talk • contribs)

Above user has only 7 edits, six of which have involved nominees. I, like many others, am suspicious of "Don't delete" votes. Nobody phrases it that way. Royboy crashfan

19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You "know" it's on IMDb? Give us the link. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Jim62sch 20:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All They seem to be very concerned about their privacy. Let's help them out. (Seriously, though, non-notable, especially since they don't want to give their names) Fagstein 20:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete none Im glad theres finally an article about the funny shorts made by this duo. whats with all the delete votes? seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.50.176 (talk • contribs)
- This user has already voted above. Only one recommendation per user, please. I do give you credit for removing your personal attack though. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all No evidence of notability. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 22:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as VanitySelfPromoCruft with a charming newbie/unsigned keep campaign to boot. Deiz 00:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all; nn + puppet swarm = far too high a cruftiness factor for my limits. Bearcat 07:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.