Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.I.S. Forums

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S.I.S. Forums[edit]

"Small" Non-notable web forum, which unfortunately are a dime a dozen. Wildthing61476 01:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Google brings about 35,000 results, but these are for quite a few different forums as well as profiles of users on those forums. I can't access the Alexa ranking of this particular forum (slow connection; it comes up as 404 error 95% of the time), but I'm guessing it's quite low. Srose (talk) 01:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't come near WP:WEB, and anything on it would be unverifiable. --Wafulz 02:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Couldn't pass WP:WEB to save its life. 19 members, 64 topics. Even the article admits it's a very small forum. JIP | Talk 07:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.UberCryxic 19:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Could go Either Way I am a member of the forum, it actually had 30 members at one time, but the forum went under heavy modifications (sp?) so many people left, I think it should be kept on Wikipedia, but that's my opinion... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.169.210 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 28 September 2006
Delete per nom. RFerreira 23:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.