Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sólo lo Mejor 20 Éxitos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | confabulate _ 02:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sólo lo Mejor 20 Éxitos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some sort of (fake) disambiguation page about a series of red-linked non-notable compilations, none of them apparently deserving an article. Blatant nonsense as a dab page, no claim of notability if it is intended as an article about the series. Cavarrone 12:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the album has gone then no need for dab - I'm assuming this isn't coincidence with the non-discussed sudden deletion 21:00, 30 June 2014 User:Ronhjones (talk | contribs) deleted page Sólo lo Mejor 20 Éxitos (Mijares album) (Expired PROD, concern was: unsourced article about NN compilation album, fails WP:NALBUMS) ... User:Cavarrone that album had been sitting there quite happily for how many many years until it was removed without discussion? You didn't object to the album until it had been disambiguated and an artist name added. What is the logic of that? As far as sources, Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 2002 ".. SPANISH PHRASE "SOLO LO MEJOR 20 EXITOS" MEANS "ONLY THE BEST 20 HITS" IN ENGLISH. FOR SERIES OF MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 AND 38). FIRST USE 6-0-2001; IN COMMERCE 6-0-2001." etc. but it wasn't intended for sources because it is a dab page. If you and the creator of that article have had a discussion and decided to delete the album that was hogging that title, fine. I don't particularly care if that one title-hogging album is gone to delete the list of the rest. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In ictu oculi, have you ever heard about WP:NOTABILITY? If you have valid sources that support an article about the compilation series which goes beyond a list of artists/titles, then provide them and I will be very happy to withdrawn the nomination. If you have sources that support the notability of Sólo lo Mejor 20 Éxitos (Mijares album), then provide them and ask for the restoration of the article. But the source you cited above is a primary source and it clearly doesn't constitute significant coverage. So please try again. Cavarrone 15:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, If the album has gone then no need for dab, if you and the creator of that article have had a discussion and decided to delete the album that was hogging that title, fine. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just for record, I had no discussion with the creator of that article, nor we "suddendly decided" that deletion. Look at the log, it was deleted through a regular, public 10-days-prod/procedure. Cavarrone 20:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to article or delete The only future for this title is an article about the series, while none of the individual ones are likely to be notable. No article, then delete it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.