Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryszard Praszkier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ryszard Praszkier[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional autobiography of an academic. Currently zero secondary sources. Does not appear to pass WP:NACADEMIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to pass WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR; Wikipedia is not a CV host. XOR'easter (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete references are supposed to be about a person, not by them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. One co-authored book with 100+ cites. All other works at <20 cites. No awards or coverage by independent sources. PS. Note that his article will remain on Polish Wikipedia, as Polish Wikipedia's equivalent of PROF states that habilitation is generally sufficient for an academic bio to be notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I cited an independent review of the co-authored book in this article but an editor using the name of the subject removed it, leaving the article with no citations to independent sources. I buggered if I'm going to look for further sources in these circumstances. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't really find anything to show where this specific Ryszard Praszkier is notable. He received one review, but this isn't enough by itself to establish notability. His work is occasionally cited, but not enough to where I'd say he could really establish notability per NPROF. To be honest, most of the time when I did pull up this name it was referring to Richard Prasquier, who was born the same year and was originally called Ryszard Praszkier before he changed his name. On that note, if/when this is deleted I would recommend turning this into a redirect to his article since it does seem like there are one or two places that do use his birth name. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.