Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Persaud (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Persaud[edit]

Ryan Persaud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There didn't seem to be any changes in his accomplishments in the last two years which would affect notability, but not eligible for speedy, so here we are. Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No FC/LA/T20 appearances or international appearances so fails WP:NCRIC. Looks to have played a bit of U19 cricket for the US, but this doesn't make him notable, and neither does being signed for the CPL as he'd have had to have played. In terms of GNG there's passing mentions and squad announcements, but not much else. I doubt his movie career is notable either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:56, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Per nom and comments by Rugbyfan22. StickyWicket (talk) 13:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - lots of sources, but we're talking lists, databases refs and scorecards only as far as I can tell. Not even a paragraph dealing with him in depth. Even if he had a handful of slightly dubious list A appearances I'd probably suggest we don't need a full article given just this sourcing. Hopefully it doesn't get re-created again until there are suitable sources. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Doesn't appears to be a notable person as per gng.Timetraveller80 (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.