Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Moran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Moran[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Online sources are affiliated. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article was nominated for deletion approximately five hours after it was created. I generally disapprove of this practice per WP:NODEADLINE, as I feel editors should be given time to flesh out the article and add new sources in all but the most obvious cases, but here we are. Withholding my !vote for now until I have time to do more research. Smartyllama (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:NOTPROMO. An interview by a local TV station is about all I could find. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this tiny article definitely appears promotional, and based on its lack of independent sources it seems to fail WP:NBIO. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 21:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The author has had over a week and it still seems like self-promotion with no reliable sources showing notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems like promo and only self-published sources. Had more than a week to improve it. ArcticDragonfly (talk) 18:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete non-notable individual.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. I've seen no evidence that this guy is notable. Smartyllama (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.