Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Harwood (businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Harwood (businessman)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has had to be deleted multiple times via CSD. Continuous adding of non-sourced, puffery material. And added back and removal of main tags by what I suspect is a sockpuppet. I cannot find info to make it pass WP:BIO via 42 as the sources seem to involve the company and not actual substantial coverage of the subject themself. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree the coverage that exists is about the company, not the subject. No problem with the creator submitting a draft for that, since they very obviously have a conflict of interest. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Creator works for him, see talk page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches found nothing particularly good aside from this and this. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to PureWow, his company - which is probably notable, though opinions may differ. There is not enough biographical information for a separate article about him. Both articles were created by the same POV editor, probably Harwood himself. The author and a probable sockpuppet have been blocked. This title has been speedied only once that I can find, so probably no need to salt at this time. --MelanieN (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.